Pay attention on Pass-king C_THR81_2605 Practice Materials, clear exam 100% for sure

SAP C_THR81_2605 Exam Overview:

SAP C_THR81_2605 Exam Syllabus Topics:

SAP Certified - SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central Core and Position Management (C_THR81_2605) Sample Questions:

1. In a public cloud SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central Core and Position Management project, a consultant is testing a workflow for manager-submitted temporary manager reassignment requests. In the web-based environment, requests for all tested populations save and enter workflow correctly. However, for one newly added operational population, requests that include both a temporary end date and a position-linked reporting change are routed to the standard manager-approval path instead of the intended risk-review step.
Existing populations with the same combination still route through the risk-review step. The customer wants to preserve the shared workflow model because creating separate population-specific workflows would increase maintenance after go-live. The consultant must correct the routing issue without changing the business process design.
What is the best corrective action?
Response:

A) Add the risk reviewers directly into the standard manager-approval path so the affected requests still receive additional oversight.
B) Ask managers in the new population to send those requests through HR administrators until the workflow model is revisited later.
C) Create a separate workflow for the new operational population so those requests always include the risk-review step.
D) Review the routing rule or condition precedence for the new population, then correct the logic for requests combining temporary end date with position-linked reporting change.

2. In a public cloud SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central Core tenant, a consultant is validating a rehire process in the web-based UI before a phased regional rollout. For one regional population, the rehire transaction opens and employee search works, but after the company selection is made, the expected set of business units is incomplete.
Other regions display valid options correctly. HR administrators confirm the missing business units were introduced in a recent organizational maintenance cycle and should remain available only within approved corporate structures. The customer wants the issue corrected without exposing unrelated business units to the region or asking users to complete the rehire with temporary placeholder assignments.
What is the best next step?
Response:

A) Review the corporate data relationships for the affected business units and correct the organizational associations controlling their availability in the rehire process.
B) Create duplicate business unit records for the region so the rehire process can continue without changing current associations.
C) Grant rehire users visibility to all business units in the tenant so the incomplete list is no longer region-dependent.
D) Ask HR administrators to complete the rehire with a generic business unit and correct the final assignment later through direct maintenance.

3. In a public cloud SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central Core tenant, a consultant is validating a global transfer process in the web-based UI after a recent corporate data refresh. For one country group, users can start the transfer and choose the legal entity, but the cost center list is unexpectedly broader than intended and includes values from another region.
The transfer can still be saved, so the issue is not blocking execution. HR leadership wants the consultant to fix the problem before user training because financial reporting depends on controlled cost center selection. The customer does not want to remove the cost center field from the transaction or introduce a separate transfer design for that country group.
What is the best corrective action?
Response:

A) Duplicate the country-specific cost centers under new records so users can distinguish the correct values during transfer entry.
B) Review the organizational associations introduced in the recent corporate data refresh and correct the relationship controlling cost center availability for that country group.
C) Ask users to select the correct cost center manually from the broader list because the transfer still saves successfully.
D) Hide the cost center field for that country group until the corporate data refresh can be reviewed after training.

4. In a public cloud SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central tenant, a consultant is supporting a scheduled import of employee standard-hours corrections before a monthly payroll control check. The import completes, but a subset of rows posts with warnings and leaves the target records unchanged. The affected employees already have approved future workflow requests for leave-related status changes in the same effective period.
Other employees in the same file update correctly in the web-based environment. The customer wants the current standard-hours correction preserved without deleting the approved future requests, because those requests are already part of the approved staffing plan. They also do not want a recurring manual exception process for employees with future approved changes.
What is the best next step?
Response:

A) Exclude employees with approved future workflow requests from all future standard-hours imports and require HR administrators to maintain those cases manually.
B) Retry the warning rows under a broader administrative role so the import can override the approved future state for this monthly cycle.
C) Delete the approved future leave-related workflow requests, then rerun the warning rows so the standard-hours correction can load without conflict.
D) Adjust the import handling for employees with overlapping approved future changes so the standard-hours correction fits into the effective-dated timeline without replacing later records.

5. A consultant is validating a controlled monthly correction process in a web-based SAP SuccessFactors Employee Central tenant before audit preparation begins. HR operations users can search for employees, open records, and enter changes for all approved populations. For one sensitive executive population, however, the import preview used for batch correction includes the records, but final processing leaves those rows unchanged with an access-related message.
HR administrators can process the same rows successfully. The customer wants the approved operations team to handle this executive population only for the monthly correction process, without granting broad administrator access or weakening the stricter control boundary. The solution must remain repeatable for future month-end cycles.
What is the best corrective action?
Response:

A) Copy the HR administrator permissions to the operations team during month-end so the executive rows can process without further adjustment.
B) Temporarily move the executive population into the general operations scope during each monthly cycle and restore the restriction afterward.
C) Review the operations role and target-population authorization for the final correction-processing step, then adjust only the approved execution scope for that executive population.
D) Ask HR administrators to process the executive population separately every month while operations users continue with the rest of the population.

Solutions: